Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751441AbXEAPah (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 11:30:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751669AbXEAPah (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 11:30:37 -0400 Received: from mail1.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.67]:46025 "EHLO mx1.skjellin.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750979AbXEAPaf (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 11:30:35 -0400 Message-ID: <46375D1C.4050404@tomt.net> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 17:30:36 +0200 From: Andre Tomt User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List CC: "Robert P. J. Day" Subject: Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 929 Lines: 23 Robert P. J. Day wrote: > at the risk of spawning yet another thread and another flamefest, > what *are* the kernel features that should be considered candidates > for removal, either now or at some point in the future. > > please, no discussions about mechanisms or kernel warnings or the > like -- just the features whose value is nearing their end. i'll even > volunteer to collect all that info and summarize it here: > > http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Stuff_to_be_removed > > because that's just the kind of guy i am, and i have the week off, and > i'm bored. :-) > > rday > Already documented in the kernel tarball, see Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/