Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:40:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:40:42 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:33033 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:40:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] sched_[set|get]_affinity() syscall, 2.4.15-pre9 From: Robert Love To: Ryan Cumming , mingo@elte.hu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <1006472754.1336.0.camel@icbm> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.1+cvs.2001.11.14.08.58 (Preview Release) Date: 26 Nov 2001 22:39:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1006832357.1385.3.camel@icbm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 19:20, Ryan Cumming wrote: > Here here, I was just thinking "Well, I like the CPU affinity idea, but I > loathe syscall creep... I hope this Robert Love fellow says something about > that" as I read your email's header. I did a procfs-based implementation of a user interface for setting CPU affinity. It implements various features like Ingo's with the change that it is, obviously, a procfs entry and not a set of syscalls. It is readable and writable via /proc//affinity I posted a patch to lkml moments ago, but it is also available at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/cpu-affinity (please use a mirror). Comments, suggestions, et cetera welcome -- if possible under the new thread. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/