Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754830AbXEARTF (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 13:19:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754922AbXEARTF (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 13:19:05 -0400 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:59746 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754830AbXEARTD (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 13:19:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 19:18:42 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: "Robert P. J. Day" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: so ... what *are* candidates for removal? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 2.0 points, 6.0 required 2.0 REMOVE_PAGE URI: URL of page called "remove" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 923 Lines: 26 On May 1 2007 11:01, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > at the risk of spawning yet another thread and another flamefest, >what *are* the kernel features that should be considered candidates >for removal, either now or at some point in the future. > > please, no discussions about mechanisms or kernel warnings or the >like -- just the features whose value is nearing their end. i'll even >volunteer to collect all that info and summarize it here: > >http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Stuff_to_be_removed > >because that's just the kind of guy i am, and i have the week off, and >i'm bored. :-) You could work on the menuconfig objects - I don't think I was done. :p Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/