Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753205AbXEAT4X (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 15:56:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753096AbXEAT4X (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 15:56:23 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:35676 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753199AbXEAT4W (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 15:56:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:55:59 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub Message-Id: <20070501125559.9ab42896.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20070430162007.ad46e153.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 18 On Tue, 1 May 2007 19:10:29 +0100 (BST) Hugh Dickins wrote: > > Most of the rest of slub. Will merge it all. > > Merging slub already? I'm surprised. My thinking here is "does slub have a future". I think the answer is "yes", so we're reasonably safe getting it into mainline for the finishing work. The kernel.org kernel will still default to slab. Does that sound wrong? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/