Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, steve@sk2.org,
        support.opensource@diasemi.com
Cc:     patches@opensource.cirrus.com, wsa@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20220325171243.1218003-1-steve@sk2.org>
References: <20220325171243.1218003-1-steve@sk2.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: da[79]*: use simple i2c probe function
Message-Id: <164915108791.276574.934197360062835441.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:31:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:12:43 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> The i2c probe functions here don't use the id information provided in
> their second argument, so the single-parameter i2c probe function
> ("probe_new") can be used instead.
> 
> This avoids scanning the identifier tables during probes.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: da[79]*: use simple i2c probe function
      commit: 89be5dc60d67b377be60b47dd12d1a3ee142aacb

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark