Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753989AbXEAURT (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 16:17:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753639AbXEAURT (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 16:17:19 -0400 Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:3960 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753294AbXEAURS (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 16:17:18 -0400 From: Martin Steigerwald To: ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ck] 2.6.21-ck1-rc1 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:17:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200705011618.57640.kernel@kolivas.org> <200705012143.38677.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (sfid-20070501_215854_476326_4EDBE198) In-Reply-To: <200705012143.38677.Martin@lichtvoll.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705012217.14395.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1611 Lines: 44 Am Dienstag 01 Mai 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Dienstag 01 Mai 2007 schrieb Con Kolivas: > > Let's call this a release candidate for 2.6.21-ck1. I've managed to > > be well enough for enough time to bang this out. > > > > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/pre-releases/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck1-rc1/ [...] > Hello Con! > > Works nicely here. Did my usual stress testing... music playback is > absolutely smooth. > > I will test it during the next 1-2 days at least. > > Got ridicolous long releasenames now ;-): > 2.6.21.1-tp23-sws2-2.2.9.13-ck1-rc1-hotfix-sched-idleprio > 2.6.21.1-tp42-sws2-2.2.9.13-ck1-rc1-hotfix-sched-idleprio > > Feels really very responsive. Those other patches seem to add to the > responsiveness to sd-0.46 quite well. Can't really tell whether cfs-v7 > or cfs-v8-rc3 is really a slight bit smoother or not. Subjectively [as I initially thought when comparind sd-0.46 without other ck patches with cfs] > seems to be pretty much the same now. Hmmm, maybe thats the desktop tune patch which sets rr_interval for SD to 6 (from the default of 8) making the difference here. Anyway its very difficult to tell a difference between ck1-rc1 and CFS-v8-rc3 from subjective perception. I am really satisfied with both of them. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/