Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946022AbXEAVDe (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 17:03:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946032AbXEAVDd (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 17:03:33 -0400 Received: from smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.200]:41016 "EHLO smtpq1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946022AbXEAVDb (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 17:03:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4637AA91.1010901@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 23:01:05 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel , "Eric W. Biederman" , Andi Kleen , Jeff Garzik , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: arch/i386/boot rewrite, and all the hard-coded video cards References: <463698D5.20102@zytor.com> <4637A3F6.70508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4637A3F6.70508@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1743 Lines: 36 On 05/01/2007 10:32 PM, Rene Herman wrote: > On 05/01/2007 04:43 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> Doubtful. The Tseng ET4000 cards may have been the gold standard in >> 1991, but I don't think most people even _remember_ them. And if they >> have them in their machines, they probably tend to run a Linux-1.2 >> kernel, or at least not care a lot about graphics (ie they may have an >> old card in the machine just because they need VGA to boot, rather >> than because they care about Tseng). > > My 386 has an ET4000. An ET4000AX/W32 even. And you bet it's because > it's nifty! Okay, I'll admit the thing doesn't currently run a 2.6 > kernel... > > The answer will probably be "no", but would this be a good point to ask > if this would be a good time to not bother with the mode switching code > at all anymore? I'm generally rather appreciative of old gunk but I > haven't cared for that specific feature for ages now. I personally don't > use framebuffer, but I would if I wanted more than the plain VGA my BIOS > sets up. Confusingly put; please consider a "If the switching code in itself is still considered relevant, " to be present here. But rip it all out, I'd say... > I'd consider keeping anything but VESA 1.2 (which that ET4000 and most > all other Super VGA cards of the era also do!) nonsensical and as far as > I'm concerned this includes all the VGA modes with the strange number of > lines; a 43/60-line VGA screen is too horrible to look at anyway... Rene. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/