Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946033AbXEAWIw (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 18:08:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946032AbXEAWIw (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 18:08:52 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:13019 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946033AbXEAWIv (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 18:08:51 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.14,475,1170662400"; d="scan'208";a="237537598" Message-ID: <4637BA70.8000108@intel.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 15:08:48 -0700 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Lespinasse CC: Chuck Ebbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Jones , Jeb Cramer , John Ronciak , Jesse Brandeburg , Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel References: <20070501130715.GB29131@zoy.org> <46375E04.5030506@redhat.com> <20070501214912.GA4048@zoy.org> In-Reply-To: <20070501214912.GA4048@zoy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2007 22:08:49.0555 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BC69E30:01C78C3D] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1253 Lines: 26 Michel Lespinasse wrote: > (I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue > seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was > trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two > seconds, as shown with report_lost_ticks. This is with a DQ965GF > motherboard with onboard E1000). that's perfectly likely. The main issue is that we read the hardware stats every two seconds and that can consume quite some time. It's strange that you are losing that many ticks IMHO, but losing one or two might very well be. We've been playing with all sorts of solutions to this problem and haven't come up with a way to reduce the load of the system reading HW stats, and it remains the most likely culprit, allthough I don't rule out clean routines just yet. This could very well be exaggerated at 100mbit speeds as well, I never looked at that. I've had good results with 2.6.21.1 (even running tickless :)) on these NICs. Have you tried that yet? Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/