Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:10:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:10:49 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.152.185]:26248 "EHLO opus.bloom.county") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:10:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:10:12 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "David S. Miller" Cc: olh@suse.de, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/802/Makefile Message-ID: <20011126221012.C13091@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> In-Reply-To: <20011126.112033.88487539.davem@redhat.com> <20011126203527.C31937@suse.de> <20011126.114045.102135510.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011126.114045.102135510.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:40:45AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Olaf Hering > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:35:27 +0100 > > Can you submit that version? ;) > > No, because it is writable by the user in every kernel source tree I > have ever seen, the change makes no sense. You haven't tried a BitKeeper tree then. You have to explicitly get write permission. > In the official tarballs it is writable, and even in every CVS tree > (2.2.x, 2.4.x vger) I have looked at it is writable. > > And as Alan has stated, this code is pretty irrelevant soon. If this rewrite goes into 2.4, yes. And using 2.2 as an example it could after a while... -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/