Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992599AbXEBAsG (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 20:48:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992588AbXEBAsG (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 20:48:06 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([209.217.80.40]:55058 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992584AbXEBAsD (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 20:48:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:34:19 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Alan Cox Cc: Chuck Ebbert , Jeff Garzik , Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans) Message-ID: <20070501233419.GA10462@kroah.com> References: <20070430162007.ad46e153.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46368062.6000100@garzik.org> <20070430170919.45e4b42b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <463688AD.1050903@garzik.org> <20070501004036.GS2819@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <46368DA5.7070003@garzik.org> <20070501045806.GA3697@kroah.com> <46376748.6020408@redhat.com> <20070501174033.2046f289@the-village.bc.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070501174033.2046f289@the-village.bc.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1343 Lines: 32 On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:40:33PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > But distros can easily add the device id to their kernel if needed, it > > > isn't something that the -stable tree shoud be accepting. Otherwise, we > > > will be swamped with those types of patches... > > > > > > > Oh sure, leave the distros swamped with them instead. :) > > > > And they all have to do it separately, meaning they don't stay in sync > > and they duplicate each other's work... > > Well they *don't* have to work that separately. They could set up some > shared tree which would look suspiciously like what Greg is doing but > with the ID updates.... ;) And is this really a problem? The whole goal of the -stable tree was to accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted bugfixes and security updates. It was not for new features or new hardware support. If people feel we should revisit this goal, then that's fine, and I have no objection to that. But until then, I think the rules that we have had in place for over the past 2 years should still remain in affect. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/