Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2022 15:22:09 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     dsterba@suse.cz, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Folio fixes for 5.18
Message-ID: <YkxQkZ24Zz9KCxK1@casper.infradead.org>
References: <YkdKgzil38iyc7rX@casper.infradead.org>
 <20220405120848.GV15609@twin.jikos.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220405120848.GV15609@twin.jikos.cz>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 02:08:48PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> Matthew, can you please always CC linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org for any
> patches that touch code under fs/btrfs? I've only noticed your folio
> updates in this pull request. Some of the changes are plain API switch,
> that's fine but I want to know about that, some changes seem to slightly
> modify logic that I'd really like to review and there are several missed
> opportunities to fix coding style. Thanks.

I'm sorry, that's an unreasonable request.  There's ~50 filesystems
that use address_space_operations and cc'ing individual filesystems
on VFS-wide changes isn't feaasible.