Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:02:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Cc:     linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] usb: phy: generic: Support enabling/disabling VBUS
Message-ID: <YkxaIK/y+7H8HgwZ@kroah.com>
References: <20220114170941.800068-1-sean.anderson@seco.com>
 <ffee044a-d34f-6be5-1fa9-c14cf3bb30de@seco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ffee044a-d34f-6be5-1fa9-c14cf3bb30de@seco.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 10:51:34AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/14/22 12:09 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > The generic USB phy has had VBUS-related code for a long time, but it
> > has always been broken, since the regulator was never gotten from the
> > device tree. However, the support itself seems not very useful, since
> > e.g.  usb_phy_vbus_on/off has no users and usb_phy_set_power is only
> > used by gadgets to make sure they don't draw too much current. Instead,
> > use the VBUS regulator to implement otg_set_vbus, which is called from
> > several drivers. This results in a change in semantics of VBUS, but
> > since support was always broken I don't think this will have any affect.
> > 
> > 
> > Sean Anderson (4):
> >   dt-bindings: usb: usb-nop-xceiv: Repurpose vbus-regulator
> >   usb: phy: generic: Get the vbus supply
> >   usb: phy: generic: Implement otg->set_vbus
> >   usb: phy: generic: Disable vbus on removal
> > 
> >  .../bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.yaml           |  8 +--
> >  drivers/usb/phy/phy-generic.c                 | 55 +++++++++----------
> >  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> ping?
> 
> When this was submitted I got an email saying that the merge window was
> closed... but I think it has opened and closed again during the
> intervening time.

It opened yesterday.  Please give us a chance to catch up.

While that happens, please take the time to review other changes on the
mailing lists, we can always use the help.

thanks,

greg k-h