Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992730AbXEBExS (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 00:53:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992732AbXEBExS (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 00:53:18 -0400 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:47968 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992730AbXEBExR (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 00:53:17 -0400 Message-Id: <1178081597.3065.1187632233@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: /TakoM2e/Q6E8NvaDKCqvazNSZQxKnIvlDRHDySlQows 1178081597 From: lkml777@123mail.org To: "Edward Shishkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric Hopper" , "William Heimbigner" , "Alex Zarochentsev" , "Andi Kleen" , "Rik van Riel" , "Jeff Chua" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <20070423111939.c876c9cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <462E17AF.7090604@namesys.com> Subject: Re: Question about Reiser4 In-Reply-To: <462E17AF.7090604@namesys.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:53:17 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2304 Lines: 84 Hi Edward, it seems that lkml has contacted both of my email accounts and cripped them. I can no longer recieve email from lkml on this account. I can neither recieve or send email to lkml from my other account. They have also just deleted the 4 emails I sent to lkml from the page http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/30/ This included one to you. In case you didn't get it,... here it is again. (Since you still haven't answered this one). ----------------- On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:03:12 +0400, "Edward Shishkin" said: > lkml777@123mail.org wrote: > > > > >As I understand it, the default Reiser4 DOES NOT USE any compression at > >all, not even tail compression, > > > > ^tail compression^tail conversion > Reiser4 does use tail conversion by default. > > > but saves space by eliminating block > >alignment wastage (tail compression is an option). > > > >So lets LOSE the statistics that involve compression. The results now > >look like this: > > > >.-------------------------. > >| FILESYSTEM | TIME |DISK | > >| TYPE |(secs)|USAGE| > >.-------------------------. > >|REISER4 | 3462 | 692 | > >|EXT2 | 4092 | 816 | > >|JFS | 4225 | 806 | > >|EXT4 | 4408 | 816 | > >|EXT3 | 4421 | 816 | > >|XFS | 4625 | 779 | > >|REISER3 | 6178 | 793 | > >|FAT32 |12342 | 988 | > >|NTFS-3g |10414 | 772 | > >.-------------------------. > > > >These results are still EXTREMELY GOOD for REISER4. > > > > > > Everything is not so simple in the science of testing.. > Would you please change direction of your activity to stressing > instead of benchmarking? Caught oopses would have great value.. > OK? > > Regards, > Edward. > Tail conversion is NOT compression,.... So what exactly is your point? By "tail compression" I mean plugin ctail40, but since I was never able to get it to work, maybe its not tail compression at all. -- lkml777@123mail.org -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen european swallow - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/