Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 01:24:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 01:23:49 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:60677 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 01:23:37 -0500 Message-ID: <3C03315C.5060203@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:23:24 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Myers CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] omnibus header cleanup, certification In-Reply-To: <20011127061714.A41881@cantrip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nathan Myers wrote: >> > Please review at least the portion that you are responsible for, > and verify that the changes are safe and cannot change the semantics > of otherwise-correct code that uses the affected macros. (That will > be easy, they're all trivial parenthesizations. It seems worth noting > here that in the C grammar, "-1" is not a numeric literal, but a unary > expression.) Then, pass on your evaluation to Linus and Marcelo. > It's also worth noting that there is nothing that it can get confused with and still have a compilable expression. I don't believe the unary-expression patches are necessary. They are, of course, harmless, except for the fact that my eyes glazed over staring at page after page of these, which very few actual potential (!) bugs (there were a couple, like the iopage+ ones...) -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/