Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:42:43 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/23] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
Message-ID: <YkzF4/e86qwcuXiA@xz-m1.local>
References: <20220405014646.13522-1-peterx@redhat.com>
 <20220405151616.bf25fa4aad55536cd031e1ab@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220405151616.bf25fa4aad55536cd031e1ab@linux-foundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 03:16:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Apr 2022 21:46:23 -0400 Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is v8 of the series to add shmem+hugetlbfs support for userfaultfd
> > write protection. 
> 
> Various compilation catastrophes with x86_64 allnoconfig.  I poked at
> the include ordering for a while but other things quickly became more
> attractive ;)

Sorry about that.  I still don't know what's the problem, but I'll give it
a shot soon.

I think I only tried out with the new configs but not all the rest configs.
I thought there're some bot looking after that one, from which I used to
receive build reports. And IIRC I fixed some build issues in early versions
from those reports.  Maybe I was wrong..

Any more hints on the latter?

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu