Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 021/599] locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class
Date:   Tue,  5 Apr 2022 09:25:15 +0200
Message-Id: <20220405070259.447667012@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220405070258.802373272@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20220405070258.802373272@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

commit 61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017 upstream.

It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may
potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key()
is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This
is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key()
fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process.

After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed
but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to
it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep
is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if
KASAN is enabled.

To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always
search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and
zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/

Fixes: 8b39adbee805 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Cheng-Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -6209,7 +6209,13 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_m
 		lockdep_reset_lock_reg(lock);
 }
 
-/* Unregister a dynamically allocated key. */
+/*
+ * Unregister a dynamically allocated key.
+ *
+ * Unlike lockdep_register_key(), a search is always done to find a matching
+ * key irrespective of debug_locks to avoid potential invalid access to freed
+ * memory in lock_class entry.
+ */
 void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 {
 	struct hlist_head *hash_head = keyhashentry(key);
@@ -6224,10 +6230,8 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_
 		return;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	if (!graph_lock())
-		goto out_irq;
+	lockdep_lock();
 
-	pf = get_pending_free();
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(k, hash_head, hash_entry) {
 		if (k == key) {
 			hlist_del_rcu(&k->hash_entry);
@@ -6235,11 +6239,13 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!found);
-	__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1);
-	call_rcu_zapped(pf);
-	graph_unlock();
-out_irq:
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!found && debug_locks);
+	if (found) {
+		pf = get_pending_free();
+		__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1);
+		call_rcu_zapped(pf);
+	}
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	/* Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry. */