Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp1000994pxb; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbs3rkSoYcWv/N0mV47oFbP6oHCDfYdzLKmqY2pZ4qjPLNMUWYOHi6PKyY6mXzQzkLLe+v X-Received: by 2002:a65:614e:0:b0:380:bfd9:d4ea with SMTP id o14-20020a65614e000000b00380bfd9d4eamr7106174pgv.92.1649251579678; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1649251579; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ampl6Fr18VbuvDeDB2RS2YAo8XOLFf8kvAN7wrFdfOgn8V/DaI1MMgunNBjJuPR1t5 0C+1uwK0FoDHu+leugEDVBVs92eP0Ucr35sPeOeYf96NbF34gEFT8yzXZU3lwaKiojoM TxRwZHQRPUCEsgysvWdxOYpFgFP87O1W3lcyKkRE+GT6hojJjCnYrANyaRQYbSqckqF0 /wjmzlqAZYUcc9m12RHv1PuZk1ysH4UCo3fHcQ5+QJRwTv+jyzcyYDUslaF16M45wslC TFqscrvudtKWZ0LBjp9fkbRIWqIb3LQEVGhtivWChnAdiHSCVUQodYaz2wqSPw5U6hRQ U5bw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=RipF2sDxCVo9q2EK1KCVAMcx4kdSJtLIqkmkUKxesng=; b=0tO/zm4j5rd4UWHeWF1dptHp20udnfPiCpCbwyqOD8JU+ZbAHw4+eZjRCZuDlZxr/f aHsJKjn/uT6k8SkeDvpfRLdOxTDMvbwFMkZ3y4d2w1aEsvu0C4lDCb7uMmI+sp1ZKpcY AT4dbCsEoKGv9+PUN5K54FgtkY4R//tUXKl2S+BN7ETr/YFEgaT0ChJyum/12iOSKhjR 5k3cM4WLNQIPBP1KR3W7tpgZaCkVh2nRvvWBQc5Jd0NBhHfdITp7hFMW0VMTM0W6v6Df Qs+sMKiYuMvjEs1r4a87HIfQFRSC5dZoD3dvkvhuiQVx02X5sjD5u7FX3HAHd5V01/XI gCUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=UDtQPEvY; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p15-20020a170902e74f00b00153b2d1660csi10749519plf.532.2022.04.06.06.26.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=UDtQPEvY; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BAD5B653F; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 04:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1574373AbiDEWzu (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:55:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1573239AbiDESbC (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:31:02 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C86713F6B; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B7A618CE; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CE7BC385A0; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:29:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1649183341; bh=RipF2sDxCVo9q2EK1KCVAMcx4kdSJtLIqkmkUKxesng=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UDtQPEvYZ04ZzfdoEjWld2hT2TMhLGg0yXVXsBO/Ak7o4umpRfbxucC7Z99uXH7cW AjL4HQ8Cv2Q8/ii4mTu2moWoeSOc8jQbnGrub/IfxgaD11iFCrc7AQLER7gTOkSQXP chHYTnCdfoqzHBcMCd7WyVxJciFaqtrMjwLdUqwJyUkfm+FgY2nV4fTRxSE8O1BbHH 4fqeSNDohq6f3/6vMQCIzJPzDiQn6HcWxLzP246GXjbwvh6iLdQIL8dcGsm/WXtVcq m+dhqLcYc3gy8QaSnDiahvft4KfubFEEGkGLbLeLaBFBtUhG7rTt95XU8mdHLynpFW yJ9r2pMNTlrxQ== Message-ID: <13a43c8d9e9d103009e652e7e8ff49e6844316d5.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/sgx: Simplify struct sgx_enclave_restrict_permissions From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Reinette Chatre , linux-sgx@vger.kernel.rog Cc: Dave Hansen , Nathaniel McCallum , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "open list:INTEL SGX" , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 21:30:10 +0300 In-Reply-To: <76c6e673-71fb-1068-0114-c3eea93a2fd4@intel.com> References: <20220405151642.96096-1-jarkko@kernel.org> <76c6e673-71fb-1068-0114-c3eea93a2fd4@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2022-04-05 at 10:21 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Hi Jarkko, >=20 > On 4/5/2022 8:16 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > The reasoning to change SECINFO to simply flags is stated in this inlin= e > > comment: > >=20 > > /* > > =C2=A0* Return valid permission fields from a secinfo structure provide= d by > > =C2=A0* user space. The secinfo structure is required to only have bits= in > > =C2=A0* the permission fields set. > > =C2=A0*/ > >=20 > > It is better to simply change the parameter type than require to use > > a malformed version of a data structure. >=20 > Could you please elaborate what is malformed? The structure that is accepted by the API. According to SDM permission changes are done with a structure where PT_REG is set, which gives -EINVAL. I categorize it as a bug. BR, Jarkko