Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992984AbXEBJ6c (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 05:58:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993002AbXEBJ6c (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 05:58:32 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36844 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992999AbXEBJ6a (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 05:58:30 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary irq disabling Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:58:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Mark Lord , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070501213050.GD6119@redhat.com> <4637D459.2040502@rtr.ca> <20070502044424.GA7049@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20070502044424.GA7049@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705021158.17759.ak@novell.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 826 Lines: 19 > > What does that break, or was it already broken and this fixes it? > I think neither. This function is only called at early bootup, > (start_secondary() ), and most of its callees have interrupts off anyway. > But maybe we do lose something. Andi, do you have a word on this? We need to enable them somewhere, but cpu_idle will do it in the end. So it should be safe to drop it. I guess keeping them disabled the whole time will be a little safer against potential races. I added the patch, but might want some cooking in -mm first because this is always fragile code. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/