Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp1060939pxb; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 07:50:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytXch5e2Q3ph+Uh+J1wDrENRCL5UT7Jv5JX17l1qQ9HlevtXXn0fwzC8plSAve24ksNTQA X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:cf08:b0:151:9d28:f46f with SMTP id i8-20020a170902cf0800b001519d28f46fmr8774369plg.53.1649256610693; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 07:50:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1649256610; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eKqDxV4rUVnbAnEkYVj1CwPXtVkYXDIMhDj2+J7rYVXAHuZ2lbE9HHSAzZ/iNPQsa1 oIC34xwI/6x0+C5HjOtBC2PqWVY5BvvGjY8GMUlh6PiW1anAsnruouILNVSgGX0fKdcO VNpJezlKnS2nvFYY4SIlIpfntuOI0EluX2v98VaKAbHXhE1C2xzeIk9CDJiMVxcA0tcM ShR8AnBSQrvz1456H0gKmg5wCilWusT/Rj5CANM8AUxNzGKEcYCQ+823U0eHOiACJpPd GbpibWw+HeUWeoaqvr8b43OgMZ5mq9lRhWfSk9f9g+QTnoPGkgiaPO/u4btWVjRyacgb qPrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=AVau5t0lRuzrToz/NrVioEyQito3ctkbdCMKKod2kR0=; b=DZtM4q/xjhKlrTCgSocF1OHI6V/Lcpne9xgNK7flBC1C7gGLd48gR+H7gFkORpPOH8 zd+NSmzPs6Dliqy+araq2Ve3YjVd96Vyjj7ZXDMkmRzlzZtVIAksfQ7FlK7MBxj85R24 foTpsWoMNTgAoaLMWreRdPdscNoxogeEWDo72AsZdpPd81+wWETSVJt01nC+c6PbhsN7 yRhBSAXlQmqMA1mQ8gEnyy/L4z38uV5LYgnTkEFaVMC1BaZb3L3E7uDQ+CCEwENgr8kO DzbP2a42s6KcqGXYbeXXeTz6WDMfVQRARjm+JUNBH+GxW3A3Rvawsa6eGNMt8AetUEox xPzw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Rvy2MyaS; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m2-20020a655642000000b0038265eb37fasi1612316pgs.780.2022.04.06.07.50.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 07:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=Rvy2MyaS; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E7F68EA72; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 05:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346705AbiDEVWg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:22:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53862 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1457547AbiDEQKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 12:10:07 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9F6025CD; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1B0B81B13; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 16:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9524EC385A0; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 16:08:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1649174881; bh=AoQfSTw72a5g3VVtNzddJxgTV8CHG8MijsAxNddLzcM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=Rvy2MyaS/ZPWOuRNjBC+N85V1Wd9YOS+7DkIESmc76SW7ds7bScLypq4XmbROFeFV Vt0Kf7sBAH7ncizQ+q+wMrJEE4IGtZpMl7cDoStPiigR+qwKiRs9D9wJ0u9tAF0zRd S755OJbnfXqP2UCubJlvAGKCKmCCiJ+DVrhFHejYnVl0Ej+uaVfUwZ/L8XhgycgKyO EpRB5HzyFqO6SDVDvDleSt6EOGt24w908Wkh2kBH6OfgZyCIhRvd04A/iwEH4LxVNn 8Nkbz4cLxpKqOdQKnCN0tiRQHnwBgmsByBnIolMol/U5hXodx06K2wGpP8CiZ2fQbd rzXojXTMhQ/Tw== Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 11:08:00 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Prasad Malisetty Cc: agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rajatja@google.com, refactormyself@gmail.com, quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com, quic_ramkri@quicinc.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, swboyd@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [RFC PATCH] PCI: Update LTR threshold based on LTRME bit Message-ID: <20220405160800.GA69953@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1646679549-12494-1-git-send-email-quic_pmaliset@quicinc.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 12:29:09AM +0530, Prasad Malisetty wrote: > Update LTR threshold scale and value based on LTRME (Latency > Tolenrance Reporting Mechanism) from device capabilities. s/Tolenrance/Tolerance/ I'm not familiar with "LTRME" and it doesn't appear in the PCI spec. Please use the PCIe terminology whenever possible. > In ASPM driver, LTR threshold scale and value is updating > based on tcommon_mode and t_poweron values. In kioxia NVMe, > L1.2 is failing due to LTR threshold scale and value is > greater values than max snoop/non snoop value. > > In general, updated LTR threshold scale and value should be > less than max snoop/non snoop value to enter the device > into L1.2 state. This affects all PCIe devices, so please include the PCIe spec citation that leads to this change. Please wrap the commit log to fill 75 columns. Thanks a lot for looking at this! L1.2 and LTR is real problem area, and it would be great if we could get it all sorted out. > Signed-off-by: Prasad Malisetty > > --- > Changes since v1: > - Added missing variable declaration in v1 patch. > --- > drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > index a96b742..a67746c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c > @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link, > u32 val1, val2, scale1, scale2; > u32 t_common_mode, t_power_on, l1_2_threshold, scale, value; > u32 ctl1 = 0, ctl2 = 0; > + u32 cap; > u32 pctl1, pctl2, cctl1, cctl2; > u32 pl1_2_enables, cl1_2_enables; > > @@ -499,9 +500,14 @@ static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link, > * Table 5-11. T(POWER_OFF) is at most 2us and T(L1.2) is at > * least 4us. > */ > - l1_2_threshold = 2 + 4 + t_common_mode + t_power_on; > - encode_l12_threshold(l1_2_threshold, &scale, &value); > - ctl1 |= t_common_mode << 8 | scale << 29 | value << 16; > + pcie_capability_read_dword(child, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); > + if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_LTR)) { > + l1_2_threshold = 2 + 4 + t_common_mode + t_power_on; > + encode_l12_threshold(l1_2_threshold, &scale, &value); > + ctl1 |= scale << 29 | value << 16; > + } > + > + ctl1 |= t_common_mode; > > /* Some broken devices only support dword access to L1 SS */ > pci_read_config_dword(parent, parent->l1ss + PCI_L1SS_CTL1, &pctl1); > -- > QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member > of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation >