Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:17:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:17:23 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:7175 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:17:14 -0500 Message-ID: <3C033DDE.5090400@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:16:46 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Myers CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] omnibus header cleanup, certification In-Reply-To: <20011127061714.A41881@cantrip.org> <3C03315C.5060203@zytor.com> <20011127071420.A45036@cantrip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nathan Myers wrote: > > Not true, in principle. E.g. > > #define foo -1 > ... > char f(char* a) { return foo[a]; } // -a[1] or a[-1]? > > Such an expression should, of course, be taken out and shot (although > it's far less bad than "(x = x++ % y)" that appeared in a macro until > very recently). > OK, you win :) -=hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/