Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993119AbXEBNFT (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 09:05:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993126AbXEBNFT (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 09:05:19 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.180]:57412 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993119AbXEBNFR (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 09:05:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EQW/+5gv1a/OKHYRaUtmOLqvIbJU/LoKbhBNhdV8DpUTY3w+ZF91dz7/ppUndHZCPetra0/f7r4rNmgwg0aipzGi4d1k7igWz+Aw5pdMAdPchJR/s4AHjOfwV91QBqzVGOC5YZAwtmdkw9gxSobPQxEpW8/YlcjV56d9JDAPexs= Message-ID: <46388C43.8020800@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 15:04:03 +0200 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cornelia Huck CC: gregkh@suse.de, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, oneukum@suse.de, rpurdie@rpsys.net, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, maneesh@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] sysfs: sysfs rework, take #2 References: <11777675753460-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <20070502143808.37dd5ff0@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20070502143808.37dd5ff0@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 26 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:39:35 +0900, > Tejun Heo wrote: > >> All the known regrssions are fixed. I think I've got all the >> attr->owner but haven't verified with cross compiling yet, just >> allyesconfig on x86-64 and i386. I'll try to setup some cross compile >> environments tomorrow and follow up if I can find more fallouts. > > s390 attr->owner seems to be fine afaics. > > I've run some stress tests (attach/detach) on s390 and haven't run into > any problems yet. Great, thanks a lot for testing. I've long stress tests but the only oops I've seen (which I'm trying to reproduce without success) is caused by deallocated platform device when udev for it is generated. So, I think the sysfs changes are pretty stable. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/