Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2726:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ib38csp1277470pxb; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 13:28:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz2Ch48yyIf4G9f5Gj7b3BkvyCCMhMLtYFQCp7vGdaZUigLuqqGE8rbFG+eT4s12lzcTFV3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e08:b0:1c7:585c:9034 with SMTP id pg8-20020a17090b1e0800b001c7585c9034mr11680098pjb.184.1649276891255; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 13:28:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1649276891; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=p9yHg/3AF6YhlitjRxLcIb1moR4AR41yOF2wDBdN7eEKFsXsEhhUzv+q1/m5WkaZd4 bO/pJNA2XCmqiQvWRgqieULDr497kz0L1W0LzFh3iq1Yh3HD5R8j35oyjBDlSQSszBLq FOUfBdtjeJc5CIKlSTk0oGexFzSUxBOJLJWcuXKdD3wHX1IseBGOFCqU4lKqwgdVR92e eKWS7gFOT/VfLxD8ASHdKHYnood3Bszgu6LwFapjHNo1XnDB4g4IvteLvsaVtlhDFrdT TxfucdRPCv3+GZg8HEjPgbf/s94rR30rnfi9Q2p/TZnNN4vaJ4Sjo2DJeomH4CaiETho TLtA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=hWy5I10SyMCKmhD0+kEodm/y+gl5qzddelF/Lh2wtH0=; b=sHzFon6dBiEKKFLQrG63sfyYWX92sdwXcuntEEklmHMJIKd7i9mC0x5yf/HP2L/ECO 1xjBsbu6PA5k3I5BPvzgCxxNqlFf0uvvkuminGCY43YMzNaPMBg779bsLdanKNRrM4S0 uJ9kzp4GCYazbmlFNXfCQXJtIxIq1RcI0A7CYJw+49ZBp3NrgQiapHof05NI1XRQtRmN FhYDR64ZAy2xQyrFxYRE5aD/2VFwUY3Bly6BkBhkCvPVyKw0e1c6ebbHYs4TJsPsMz8h Zhqem0lePPk4PZXHraIgpVAF3RMfhPA+gdm4PZTNTyTA4/CNWRXvrDLi38DZD+7J0KlM FTrQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=gpCaxE2L; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ie18-20020a17090b401200b001bef41cdf55si5371634pjb.47.2022.04.06.13.27.56; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 13:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=gpCaxE2L; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233137AbiDFUEE (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:04:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60052 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235409AbiDFUDu (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:03:50 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CA4F60DBA; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 236GESm1030105; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:51:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=hWy5I10SyMCKmhD0+kEodm/y+gl5qzddelF/Lh2wtH0=; b=gpCaxE2L4xXcID7HaSzkpTPuYGz8qFLUrwDxZg5+5F0pcGcIWZJaKndpwofexWytg+XR OCfsHHmyh6S+9NRP8dJKBQ8DR/bUU2HAF68vPoWSE95rJNqjq+6KnoWzSKqurm17PiLw VCTZmocNtP0TJn40CdQslYfJSWL1gTzaBDxHj87l514TBUeTWvNtMvBJIoTySaLP0u4o 1Tc+qxMpacYBnIPJHRZkqMXPLYCOkCNoq2l3n5H7eP0nz3GQGNkNoHFuOQavbwxm8/wY TxslO25B3idxtkwMfGy4Qmj211X7M20UC4aghIuv6P6Ra6fi4U+XlYlWT9/wfdxXa5Wv 5A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3f95epwyq6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 17:51:53 +0000 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 236Hgf9d011564; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:51:52 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3f95epwypm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 17:51:52 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 236Hhi6M019355; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:51:50 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3f6drhr7k4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 17:51:49 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 236HpllX43057440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:51:47 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE814C04A; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:51:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8F54C040; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:51:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.211.90.125]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 17:51:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Athira Rajeev To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, irogers@google.com Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] tools/perf: Fix perf bench numa testcase to check if CPU used to bind task is online Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 23:21:13 +0530 Message-Id: <20220406175113.87881-5-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220406175113.87881-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20220406175113.87881-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Z94Fa6rh7GGPCk_QPb0VIRZWRQ5zXAZw X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 5zuHFViFxtoaVLPnUmFfj3zwISZojtkT X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.850,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-04-06_09,2022-04-06_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2204060087 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Perf numa bench test fails with error: Testcase: ./perf bench numa mem -p 2 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0,8 -M 1,0 -s 20 -zZq --thp 1 --no-data_rand_walk Failure snippet: <<>> Running 'numa/mem' benchmark: # Running main, "perf bench numa numa-mem -p 2 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0,8 -M 1,0 -s 20 -zZq --thp 1 --no-data_rand_walk" perf: bench/numa.c:333: bind_to_cpumask: Assertion `!(ret)' failed. <<>> The Testcases uses CPU’s 0 and 8. In function "parse_setup_cpu_list", There is check to see if cpu number is greater than max cpu’s possible in the system ie via "if (bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus || bind_cpu_1 >= g->p.nr_cpus) {". But it could happen that system has say 48 CPU’s, but only number of online CPU’s is 0-7. Other CPU’s are offlined. Since "g->p.nr_cpus" is 48, so function will go ahead and set bit for CPU 8 also in cpumask ( td->bind_cpumask). bind_to_cpumask function is called to set affinity using sched_setaffinity and the cpumask. Since the CPU8 is not present, set affinity will fail here with EINVAL. Fix this issue by adding a check to make sure that, CPU’s provided in the input argument values are online before proceeding further and skip the test. For this, include new helper function "is_cpu_online" in "tools/perf/util/header.c". Since "BIT(x)" definition will get included from header.h, remove that from bench/numa.c Tested-by: Disha Goel Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev Reported-by: Disha Goel --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 8 ++++++-- tools/perf/util/header.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/header.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 29e41e32bd88..7992d79b3e41 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #include #include +#include "../util/header.h" #include #include @@ -616,6 +617,11 @@ static int parse_setup_cpu_list(void) return -1; } + if (is_cpu_online(bind_cpu_0) != 1 || is_cpu_online(bind_cpu_1) != 1) { + printf("\nTest not applicable, bind_cpu_0 or bind_cpu_1 is offline\n"); + return -1; + } + BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 < 0 || bind_cpu_1 < 0); BUG_ON(bind_cpu_0 > bind_cpu_1); @@ -786,8 +792,6 @@ static int parse_nodes_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused, return parse_node_list(arg); } -#define BIT(x) (1ul << x) - static inline uint32_t lfsr_32(uint32_t lfsr) { const uint32_t taps = BIT(1) | BIT(5) | BIT(6) | BIT(31); diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c index 6da12e522edc..3f5fcf5d4b3f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c @@ -983,6 +983,49 @@ static int write_dir_format(struct feat_fd *ff, return do_write(ff, &data->dir.version, sizeof(data->dir.version)); } +#define SYSFS "/sys/devices/system/cpu/" + +/* + * Check whether a CPU is online + * + * Returns: + * 1 -> if CPU is online + * 0 -> if CPU is offline + * -1 -> error case + */ +int is_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu) +{ + char sysfs_cpu[255]; + char buf[255]; + struct stat statbuf; + size_t len; + int fd; + + snprintf(sysfs_cpu, sizeof(sysfs_cpu), SYSFS "cpu%u", cpu); + + if (stat(sysfs_cpu, &statbuf) != 0) + return 0; + + /* + * Check if /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online file + * exists. In kernels without CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, this + * file won't exist. + */ + snprintf(sysfs_cpu, sizeof(sysfs_cpu), SYSFS "cpu%u/online", cpu); + if (stat(sysfs_cpu, &statbuf) != 0) + return 1; + + fd = open(sysfs_cpu, O_RDONLY); + if (fd == -1) + return -1; + + len = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1); + buf[len] = '\0'; + close(fd); + + return strtoul(buf, NULL, 16); +} + #ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT static int write_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff, struct evlist *evlist __maybe_unused) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.h b/tools/perf/util/header.h index c9e3265832d9..0eb4bc29a5a4 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/header.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.h @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ int do_write(struct feat_fd *fd, const void *buf, size_t size); int write_padded(struct feat_fd *fd, const void *bf, size_t count, size_t count_aligned); +int is_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu); /* * arch specific callback */ -- 2.35.1