Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+G9fYuqU45hHmK4WMUNEXQbmBucE+9fB=S9wcHEfEHaZ2jgcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220401151058.fipdax3kvmxknctv@houat> <CA+G9fYu+WddXTb0NcbviUfGQHhsmThssVCafLPw7+nj3JsoFAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220407075435.ahlylmbqmqnpxz64@houat>
In-Reply-To: <20220407075435.ahlylmbqmqnpxz64@houat>
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:12:09 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvT_W9+0AguQu97mqTm5zNnSvF0asnatZX8BTf=_1oANg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [next] db845c: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 8 at drivers/clk/clk-divider.c:139
 divider_recalc_rate
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc:     linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
        gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 13:24, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > I'm not sure if it's feasible, but if it is, it looks like something
> > > that could be fixed by the patch pasted here:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20220401122736.5yvanksa4pla7uql@houat/
> > > Could you test it?
> >
> > I have tested the single line patch and reported problems not fixed.
>
> Could you test this branch?
> https://github.com/mripard/linux/tree/rpi/clk-improvements-more-fixes

I have tested your tree and branch.
I saw more clk prints in the boot log and did not notice the reported warning.

[    0.734195] clk_set_rate_range_nolock: qdss: orphan ? n
[    0.734222] clk_set_rate_range_nolock: qdss: core req rate 0
[    0.734235] clk_set_rate_range_nolock: qdss: clamped rate 0
[    0.734249] clk_core_set_rate_nolock: qdss: rate 0
[    0.734262] clk_core_set_rate_nolock: qdss: rounded rate 0
...
[    3.574169] clk_set_rate_range_nolock: gcc_ufs_phy_ice_core_clk: orphan ? n
[    3.581271] clk_set_rate_range_nolock: gcc_ufs_phy_ice_core_clk:
core req rate 300000000
[    3.589446] clk_set_rate_range_nolock: gcc_ufs_phy_ice_core_clk:
clamped rate 300000000
[    3.597521] clk_core_set_rate_nolock: gcc_ufs_phy_ice_core_clk:
rate 300000000
...

Please refer this link for detail boot log,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/4861930#L2712

Build link
https://builds.tuxbuild.com/27SxYLYlZcKEUQGVbmnmLP3GxEp/

- Naresh

>
> Thanks!
> Maxime


--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org