Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1766951AbXEBRst (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 13:48:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1766949AbXEBRss (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 13:48:48 -0400 Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:37614 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766952AbXEBRsr (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 13:48:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:47:58 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Pierre Ossman cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/36] Use menuconfig objects II - MMC In-Reply-To: <46381F5D.3070509@drzeus.cx> Message-ID: References: <4637636C.50704@drzeus.cx> <46381F5D.3070509@drzeus.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 830 Lines: 26 On May 2 2007 07:19, Pierre Ossman wrote: >Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> >> If it works, no problem. just put your sign-off somewhere >> and let Andrew (or the appropriate subsys maintainer) have it :) >> > >Well, the appropriate subsys maintainer would be me. :) > >Has it been decided that this is the way to go? I have no strong >feelings either way. Who is to decide this? I have not seen any strong objections yet, either yes-please or I-don't-mind, so it looks kinda ok. Just act innocent. If it bugs someone, there's always the signed-off list, which will blame me :) Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/