Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S2993126AbXEBTNN@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S2993126AbXEBTNN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 May 2007 15:13:13 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993136AbXEBTNN
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 2 May 2007 15:13:13 -0400
Received: from mailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.26]:40654 "EHLO mailer.gwdg.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S2993126AbXEBTNK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 May 2007 15:13:10 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:08:41 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
       Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.
In-Reply-To: <20070502152906.GA29642@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705022108130.18504@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
References: <20070423141123.GA21174@skybase> <20070423104534.51bac974.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
 <20070425112133.4ae86399.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
 <20070425143011.57247c1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
 <20070425172447.1576c399.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070426003911.GA19383@redhat.com>
 <4630109F.6090002@oracle.com> <20070425200207.77a2721a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
 <20070428030805.GA13331@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0705021626080.3706@pademelon.sonytel.be>
 <20070502152906.GA29642@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required
	_SUMMARY_
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 731
Lines: 24


On May 2 2007 16:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:28:27PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>   - Check for GNU extension __FUNCTION__
>
>__FUNCTION__ is prefered  over __func__


`info gcc` tells:

 `__FUNCTION__' is another name for `__func__'.  Older versions of GCC
recognize only this name.  However, it is not standardized.  For
maximum portability, we recommend you use `__func__', but provide a
fallback definition with the preprocessor:[...]



Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/