Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Message-ID: <15c8aab5-41b7-4d25-4b4c-98536bc197fc@nbd.name>
Date:   Thu, 7 Apr 2022 18:59:46 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..." 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220405195755.10817-1-nbd@nbd.name>
 <20220405195755.10817-5-nbd@nbd.name>
 <d0bffa9a-0ea6-0f59-06b2-7eef3c746de1@linaro.org>
 <e3ea7381-87e3-99e1-2277-80835ec42f15@nbd.name>
 <CAK8P3a1A6QYajv_HTw79HjiJ8CN6YPeKXc_X3ZFD83pdOqVTkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <08883cf4-27b9-30bf-bd27-9391b763417c@nbd.name>
 <750c1f9e-6a53-16d5-390e-f9f81fa23afd@linaro.org>
From:   Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: document WED binding
 for MT7622
In-Reply-To: <750c1f9e-6a53-16d5-390e-f9f81fa23afd@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 06.04.22 10:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Thanks for clarification. I still wonder about the missing drivers as I
> responded to your second bindings:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220405195755.10817-1-nbd@nbd.name/T/#m6d108c644f0c05cd12c05e56abe2ef75760c6cef
> 
> Both of these compatibles - WED and PCIe - are not actually used. Now
> everything is done inside your Ethernet driver which pokes WED and
> PCIe-mirror address space via regmap/syscon.
> 
> Separate bindings might have sense if WED/PCIe mirror were ever
> converted to real drivers.I think in terms of hardware description it makes more sense to have 
separate nodes, even if the implementation uses them in one driver at 
the moment.

- Felix