Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:33:59 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "partical" kthread conversion
Message-Id: <20070502123359.e82a668d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <m11whzxp0d.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
References: <20070430162007.ad46e153.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<20070501084245.GA14364@infradead.org>
	<20070501015141.f09f6dde.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<20070502140115.GA23595@sgi.com>
	<m11whzxp0d.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1170
Lines: 27

On Wed, 02 May 2007 08:45:54 -0600
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:

> Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:51:41AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> > There's probably a few more patches falling into this category, these
> >> > were just the first one the stick into my eye.
> >> 
> >> Yes, I think I'll probably drop all of them - I've completely lost track of
> >> which ones are complete, which ones need more work, etc.
> 
> Andrew as far as dropping them.  If all you have is one of my dinky patches
> that changes things to use kthread_run feel free, because of the general
> necessity of calling kthread_stop I'm going to have to rework those anyway,
> and I still have the originals.
> 

I gave up and dropped them all - let's have another run at it.  Possibly
some of them were complete and didn't deserve dropping, in which case you
can send them straight back at me.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/