Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com
Cc:     tudor.ambarus@microchip.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20220331110819.133392-1-matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
References: <20220331110819.133392-1-matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence-quadspi: fix protocol setup for non-1-1-X operations
Message-Id: <164935157541.1057547.6578731972016383100.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 07 Apr 2022 18:12:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:08:19 +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> cqspi_set_protocol() only set the data width, but ignored the command
> and address width (except for 8-8-8 DTR ops), leading to corruption of
> all transfers using 1-X-X or X-X-X ops. Fix by setting the other two
> widths as well.
> 
> While we're at it, simplify the code a bit by replacing the
> CQSPI_INST_TYPE_* constants with ilog2().
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: cadence-quadspi: fix protocol setup for non-1-1-X operations
      commit: 97e4827d775faa9a32b5e1a97959c69dd77d17a3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark