Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Cc:     amit.pundir@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz,
        pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, tiwai@suse.com,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
In-Reply-To: <20220407094313.2880-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
References: <20220407094313.2880-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: do not switch off SIDO Buck when codec is in use
Message-Id: <164941705855.1295287.1090953205506531438.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 08 Apr 2022 12:24:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:43:13 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> SIDO(Single-Inductor Dual-Ouput) Buck powers up both analog and digital
> circuits along with internal memory, powering off this is the last thing
> that codec should do when going to very low power.
> 
> Current code was powering off this Buck if there are no users of sysclk,
> which is not correct. Powering off this buck will result in no register access.
> This code path was never tested until recently after adding pm support
> in SoundWire controller. Fix this by removing the buck poweroff when the
> codec is active and also the code that is not used.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: codecs: wcd934x: do not switch off SIDO Buck when codec is in use
      commit: db6dd1bee63d1d88fbddfe07af800af5948ac28e

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark