Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 03:49:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 03:48:55 -0500 Received: from queen.bee.lk ([203.143.12.182]:48544 "EHLO queen.bee.lk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 03:48:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:45:39 +0600 From: Anuradha Ratnaweera To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: Anuradha Ratnaweera , lkml Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.16 Message-ID: <20011127144539.A23943@bee.lk> In-Reply-To: <20011127083530.A13584@bee.lk> <20011127135847.A22859@bee.lk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from aj@suse.de on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:26:20AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:26:20AM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Anuradha Ratnaweera writes: > > > It is still not okey to include even _small_ changes, because it is hard to > > define what small is. Although we are sure that is is going to break, > > Murphey's laws may get in ...;) > > It's Marcelo deciding what it's ok and what not. I wrote about what is ok to _me_...;) There is no such thing called an absolute "ok". > I've got the impression from these threads about maintaince on lkml that a > number of people try to force something on Marcelo without giving him a > chance to find his own way of doing it. I trust Marcelo that he'll do the > right thing. So do I, and probably many others who have posted on this topic. Cheers, Anuradha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13) One should always be in love. That is the reason one should never marry. -- Oscar Wilde - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/