Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-8384790e-d2aa-4041-b4e9-aba1130d8577-1649500371045@3c-app-gmx-bap35>
From:   Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc:     Frank Wunderlich <linux@fw-web.de>,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Aw: Re:  [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix clocks for rk356x usb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:   Sat, 9 Apr 2022 12:32:51 +0200
Importance: normal
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <9183927.T7Z3S40VBb@phil>
References: <20220409075147.136187-1-linux@fw-web.de>
 <trinity-71c38625-1a00-47d7-8e23-4f33f25a997a-1649499268581@3c-app-gmx-bap35>
 <9183927.T7Z3S40VBb@phil>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

> Gesendet: Samstag, 09. April 2022 um 12:23 Uhr
> Von: "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>


> ok, so do you want to send a v2 including that change?
> Alternatively I can also add this change when applying.

imho the best way will be that peter includes my patch in his

"arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk356x dwc3 usb3 nodes"

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20220408151237.3=
165046-4-pgwipeout@gmail.com/

i just posted the fix for those who want to test his series on 5.18 includ=
ing himself.

but of course if this is not the right way, i post a v2.

> Also for educational purposes, the format for referencing a commit
> you're fixing would be
>
> Fixes: 33fb697ec7e5 ("usb: dwc3: Get clocks individually")
> Signed-off-by: ....

as the patch not really broke current mainline state, i thought Fixes-tag =
is not right.
Imho only the rk356x-usb-patch is not compatible with 5.18 due to this cha=
nge, but this is not applied yet.

regards Frank