Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:6d10:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gq16csp28075pxb; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:52:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFkZrT+0CJF53R2QHYANjn79xocCByfM9gLGRf0juKdsk8KIE1l3MY3C+SdEjFnb0miWgN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:d6:b0:413:b81:6695 with SMTP id i22-20020a05640200d600b004130b816695mr36348134edu.176.1649724769100; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:52:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1649724769; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AERwaMKBpO+bQvoIEw/ODDXVDKqNPnHuQIIbrQr34AhsZUCve8iDGOxRFp2xZDrPJh uQqVoR9N/4BTdae4QN4mLqDMTJV5ZU3dGPnL01iHqni5mvdeTtTXGDan5xpP+cnauQ2G W/CHQ1mxUd5E4Pd/OOGiTWMxnUIhI6AYG7JwHBOLrVQ/gUeSwrKc/BHtc7lDqkNXqbEn 2de3vg48VQDrhP/TQgeJ1jgneG0ii8lHgKxBGAXdFR76PLw6+n2s4/jTNUTO4Vb2+HxP ijX9+ddrmSYwPArPQqWWIT71IismY+2DJpVIC+yP9huHaE0ALPWWPkFFKkgJFnBjWqtl D0LQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=zpo56anepGh1996ZVn2ynpiLSftI9+RsEzRBaVj4yg4=; b=YIdE73R7CSBMoB124PPNvqKTTcELyIzE/0WKfrH/KbYyAG3iOOXYtmSXrFj331VnhY 4QwKoFTtOgJPd8Y8GCiFRPiyHqBUoqZbYT0Ms4wI4BRd4/Xvg/i9xWLfc8OJ/0MvMls6 dfyFu9ulXGUrC7FfKTHAf7WcwviGN+owLK2YpQTQowBru3ZZLiUiCGOKVe4HtlWlU//R IKVw5HQRr4e89/0ozUAVj80drjTZ9NEPCCcyh3eB5z2uo8Gm9XkvB/cs1ILm6H1OTK6d osBsd3NNiqCdizh3ixgu01i/6Znc3/i2hNI3DJX9yz6cmL/ED+knQfMUErQZ90BVr9+X wEiQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=INLGEH+v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a1-20020aa7d741000000b0041d79df52c6si3497312eds.63.2022.04.11.17.52.23; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=INLGEH+v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240422AbiDIBgk (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:36:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233257AbiDIBgh (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:36:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E950632C223 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 18:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id x24so6881274edl.2 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:34:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zpo56anepGh1996ZVn2ynpiLSftI9+RsEzRBaVj4yg4=; b=INLGEH+vbKT+ECgiAZQ8C9Fwbb4Ob99aqXQUVcVZlQBciKqXZJiwwAQUePzVEghVm/ tWvN94mruy6ucYM0CMQwryR8hvCHbFupHJjot82QO8BkCiK5Ka9PRxkE7HS2KBycVdEs OZKCiUK97EdIfnxWTjQ6gN9wLXadLkrpAm/SIa5t5D/OQ7TkPvlA0NbjV2gldv5qeIcu /ahC2E2aUxUs4fojmEvvksy78BvNiAZbXRq8N6MCMU/BnhuziZN9iUMa11Ec5NZL2qTT 48mk7hbS5ANaPL0fajF1tSjPYeezVsNQXmgqq4vgJk9GABhlGpp8HkdmONg3hz7cFsh4 jjpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zpo56anepGh1996ZVn2ynpiLSftI9+RsEzRBaVj4yg4=; b=i5u58vy2QDRlMFMhDVjbYrspuviNNFDIwBQ5LheeLcixGhZVDJpMTFKHtXtLHdgIZA zhGiGBlmgTxStyjeo1Ocv2qy5sM/ZmhyA6nvwyDNlIMyejHzazWHM3kP7pVvDUywodxc OeZWS65TGiYN6JoybMlKrusnBAperrTb6FIbTj94cO/XHd38mXJtayiI1u/tmR6aqRKC CRGBKo7Czhf+xYyYOV/vefqmrDKhR4fgHH/Ztb3WDQn84izR0sXiM5USACHQya6vb2Ad CWBW2emrbY0YLBxFxBUK0McANIyH6V3UF+GKcMlhd+SGxCHPKWql7tatxWqwxom6QEHu oFmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309yMIKvPDcSQ4G19TeI7z8pQJFdOUoDc166lWpbHG2pp52WSnG hUOLZRjYHz+T0Xzfe0PFlHfng9xgU8pQ6roLr2U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2945:b0:41d:aad:c824 with SMTP id ed5-20020a056402294500b0041d0aadc824mr10293856edb.364.1649468069444; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 18:34:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220408052207.209856-1-dzm91@hust.edu.cn> In-Reply-To: From: Dongliang Mu Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 09:34:02 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: f2fs: remove WARN_ON in f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr To: Chao Yu Cc: Dongliang Mu , Jaegeuk Kim , syzbot+763ae12a2ede1d99d4dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 8:27 AM Chao Yu wrote: > > On 2022/4/8 13:22, Dongliang Mu wrote: > > From: Dongliang Mu > > > > In f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr, if type is DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE or > > DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ, it invokes WARN_ON(1) not matter > > blkaddr is in the range or not. > > If we run into the path where we invoke WARN_ON(1) in f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(), > It means f2fs image may be broken, or there is a bug in f2fs. > > So, do you suffer any related issue in your environment? related issue? Can you explain a little? If you mean if this warning occurs, any other issues or crash behaviors are generated? I tested on the syzbot. After removing the WARN_ON, there is no abnormal issue or crash behaviors followed with the corresponding reproducer. > > Thanks, > > > > > Fix this by removing WARN_ON. > > > > Note that, syzbot patch testing does not incur any further issues > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+763ae12a2ede1d99d4dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu > > --- > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > index f5366feea82d..521498b2dd8c 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > > @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ static bool __is_bitmap_valid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, > > f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent error blkaddr:%u, sit bitmap:%d", > > blkaddr, exist); > > set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK); > > - WARN_ON(1); > > } > > return exist; > > } > > @@ -196,7 +195,6 @@ bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > > f2fs_warn(sbi, "access invalid blkaddr:%u", > > blkaddr); > > set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK); > > - WARN_ON(1); > > return false; > > } else { > > return __is_bitmap_valid(sbi, blkaddr, type);