Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai
In-Reply-To: <871qy6hu8q.ffs@tglx>
References: <20220409081300.4762-1-kurt@linutronix.de>
 <20220409081300.4762-2-kurt@linutronix.de>
 <20220409093727.7dda6371@rorschach.local.home> <871qy6hu8q.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Mon, 11 Apr 2022 22:58:37 +0200
Message-ID: <87k0bvfibm.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 09 2022 at 22:33, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09 2022 at 09:37, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Sat,  9 Apr 2022 10:12:58 +0200
>> Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>>> ---
>>>  include/linux/timekeeping.h |  1 +
>>>  kernel/time/timekeeping.c   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> If the time keeping folks are OK with this and ack it, I'm happy to
>> take this through my tree.
>
> Go ahead. I just sent a Reviewed-by and I don't see conflicting changes
> in that area. Famous last words :)

And yes, I have some conflicting changes in the pipeline and just saw
that this lacks a data_race() annotation like the boot variant from
which this is derived.

Let me pick this up into a rc2 based branch. I'll tag it and provide it
to you for consumption.

Thanks,

        tglx