Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:02:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:02:45 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:61196 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:02:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc-based cpu affinity user interface To: mingo@elte.hu Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:10:34 +0000 (GMT) Cc: rml@tech9.net (Robert Love), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel) In-Reply-To: from "Ingo Molnar" at Nov 27, 2001 12:52:26 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > fundamental limitation of your approach, and *if* we want to export the > cpus_allowed affinity to user-space (which is up to discussion), then the > right way (TM) to do it is via a syscall. HP and others have already implemented chunks of this stuff via syscall interfaces. There is a complete pset api. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/