Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753797AbXECOpU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 10:45:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754236AbXECOpU (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 10:45:20 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:57237 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753797AbXECOpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 10:45:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:23:18 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Damien Wyart Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8 Message-ID: <20070503145318.GA17776@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com References: <46399B51.9040608@dunaweb.hu> <20070503130201.GA9000@elte.hu> <20070503132932.GA4204@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070503132932.GA4204@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 881 Lines: 22 On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:29:32PM +0200, Damien Wyart wrote: > What are your thoughts/plans concerning merging CFS into mainline ? Is > it a bit premature to get it into 2.6.22 ? I remember Linus was ok to > change the default scheduler rapidly (the discussion was about sd at > that time) to get more testing than in -mm. And what about group scheduling extensions? Do you have plans to work on it? I was begining to work on a prototype to do group scheduling based on CFS, basically on the lines of what you and Linus had outlined earlier: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/18/271 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/18/244 -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/