Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <6738687b-eeb2-c4e3-90c8-ee3aaa73f576@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Apr 2022 09:54:40 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.8.0
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: Add binding for Sercomm
 parser
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Karim <Karimdplay@gmail.com>,
        NOGUCHI Hiroshi <drvlabo@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>, M <x1@disroot.org>,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
References: <20220406195557.1956-1-csharper2005@gmail.com>
 <20220406195946.2019-1-csharper2005@gmail.com>
 <1649339427.653492.795407.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org>
 <9cf4e596-83d7-00cc-afcc-585309cb4852@gmail.com>
 <aea5e032-5cd0-7480-13c1-2af924237532@linaro.org>
From:   Mikhail Zhilkin <csharper2005@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <aea5e032-5cd0-7480-13c1-2af924237532@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 4/9/2022 3:49 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> One? Apart of broken compilation, there were other mistakes. When you
> run the tests, you will see all of them.

I checked the first version again. It was:
- One "FATAL ERROR" (missing '{' in dts example)
- 5 warning / errors (severity not specified) "From schema"

Fixed version is here (not a single warning):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220406195557.1956-1-csharper2005@gmail.com/T/#ma43afb59fd1f0fab8899951005ae9ce011fbb0cc

Is it ok if I send it in PATCH v3?


> This is not related to dt_binding_check. if you ask about checkpatch,
> then no, this does not require fixing.


Yeah, it's about checkpatch. Thanks.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

 
Best regards,
Mikhail