Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:38:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:38:20 -0500 Received: from [212.169.100.200] ([212.169.100.200]:61172 "EHLO sexything.nextframe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:38:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:44:25 +0100 From: Morten Helgesen To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: #include to #include in the 2.2 tree. Message-ID: <20011127114425.A119@sexything> Reply-To: admin@nextframe.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.0 X-Keyboard: PFU Happy Hacking Keyboard X-Operating-System: Slackware Linux (of course) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey there, Alan and the rest of you. I was just wondering whether or not it would be a waste of time creating a patch with one goal in mind: substituting references to linux/malloc.h with references to linux/slab.h throughout the 2.2 tree. Inconsistency is a Bad Thing[tm], and since malloc.h now only includes slab.h, I feel that it is time for a major clean-up. Any thoughts ? == Morten -- mvh Morten Helgesen UNIX System Administrator & C Developer Nextframe AS, Horten, Norway admin@nextframe.net / 93445641 http://www.nextframe.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/