Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162087AbXECO42 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 10:56:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1162099AbXECO41 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 10:56:27 -0400 Received: from mail.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:37230 "EHLO lists.samba.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162087AbXECO41 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2007 10:56:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module From: simo To: Gerald Carter Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4639F5AD.20807@gmail.com> References: <524f69650704301552j13cd46e5y53a233af753e0548@mail.gmail.com> <20070501090657.GA17949@infradead.org> <1178198489.28758.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070503141742.GB20328@infradead.org> <1178203013.28758.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4639F5AD.20807@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Samba Team Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 10:56:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1178204186.28758.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1548 Lines: 41 On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 09:46 -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Simo, > > > I guess DFS referrals can work cross protocol, so if you are redirected > > from a longhorn server to a windoes 2000 or a samba server you want to > > be able to follow the DFS referral and not return an error. > > To do that you need to have either 1 module that support both protocols > > or a way from one module to call the other. Just separating the 2 > > without any glue will not work (or you will have to add some userspace > > upcall hack to make it work). > > Long term I agree that CIFS and SMB2 should be in the same .ko > But NTLM 0.12 still works for Vista and DFS referrals. > Breaking out SMB2 initially means that it will not clutter > the working cifs.ko code. Remember that an SMB2 client fs is > mostly research at this point, and not engineering. Well, development can happen in any way Steve or any other like to do it, but it seemed to me that the proposal was to split them long term. I think this would be bad wrt supporting DFS referrals. That said, it I'll shut up as kindly requested from someone that seem to know better than Samba/CIFS developers. Simo. -- Simo Sorce Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer email: idra@samba.org http://samba.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/