Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:53:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:53:28 -0500 Received: from mout01.kundenserver.de ([195.20.224.132]:26911 "EHLO mout01.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:53:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:57:59 +0100 From: Heinz Diehl To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 Message-ID: <20011127105759.GA2273@elfie.cavy.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011127095609.89426.qmail@web20503.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011127095609.89426.qmail@web20503.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.2-current-20011115i (Linux 2.5.1-pre1 i586) Organization: private site in Mannheim/Germany X-PGP-Key: To get my public-key, send mail with subject 'get pgpkey' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue Nov 27 2001, willy tarreau wrote: > I just tried 2.4.16 with and without your patch. I applied Andrew's patch to 2.5.1-pre1. > Without your patch, I could easily > reproduce the slugginess other people report, mostly > at the login prompt. But when I applied your patch, I can > log in immediately, so yes, I can say that your patch > improves things dramatically. The same thing here: with the patch applied, things improved, without I can also easily reproduce unresponsiveness. It definitely fixes the problem.... -- # Heinz Diehl, 68259 Mannheim, Germany - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/