Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 22:53:46 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_V=E5gen_J=E6gtnes?= <lorrides@gmail.com>,
       netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Routing 600+ vlan's via linux problems (looks like arp problems)
Message-ID: <20070503205346.GD18539@uranus.ravnborg.org>
References: <d20c3b7d0705031325r13834382r38ea31f26965c50@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <d20c3b7d0705031325r13834382r38ea31f26965c50@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 3402
Lines: 96

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:25:48PM +0200, ?yvind V?gen J?gtnes wrote:
> Hi,
Hi ?yvind.

Forwarding your mail to netdev where the networking people are
hanging out. Maybe they can help you.

	Sam

> 
> We have a one gigabit internet connection that is normally
> routed by a hardware juniper router. The drive in this is down
> and we need to use a linux machine (Pentium D 3 ghz) as a
> temporary router.
> Now setting up all the 600 vlans and assigning ip addresses
> is no problem. We have testet all by using a laptop, setting up
> 600 vlan interfaces on this and running dhcpclient on all.
> This worked just fine, all the interfaces got address.
> 
> Now for the real setup.
> We closed the mac of the juniper to the network card that
> would be connected to the internal LAN, set up the interfaces,
> and swapped cables. This worked fine for approximately 100
> of the computers that are connected, but the rest would not
> get IP. The connected 100 computers were routed just fine.
> 
> What we think the problem is, is that the arp cache on the
> linux router seems strange. It can resolve the MAC for the
> 100 clients that actually got through.
> For the rest all we see in the arp cache is (incomplete)
> 
> Here is some of the listing for arp -n:
> 193.239.155.118          ether   00:0A:E4:59:75:66   C
> eth1.1087
> 193.239.154.74                   (incomplete)
> eth1.1016
> 193.239.155.7            ether   00:11:95:D2:3F:FD   C
> eth1.2002
> 83.143.114.222                   (incomplete)
> eth1.1305
> 83.143.113.246           ether   00:0B:5D:4B:B8:77   C
> eth1.1247
> 83.143.116.126                   (incomplete)
> eth1.1409
> 83.143.118.114                   (incomplete)
> eth1.1534
> 193.239.154.210          ether   00:03:0D:2F:1B:7F   C
> eth1.1050
> 169.254.69.247           ether   00:15:C5:C2:31:6C   C
> eth1.1262
> 83.143.112.38                    (incomplete)
> eth1.1131
> 83.143.118.18                    (incomplete)
> eth1.1510
> 83.143.112.118           ether   00:11:95:CE:BF:72   C
> eth1.1151
> 192.168.1.2              ether   00:0D:88:78:C0:00   C
> eth1.2050
> 83.143.117.138                   (incomplete)
> eth1.1476
> 83.143.116.18                    (incomplete)
> eth1.1382
> 83.143.118.26                    (incomplete)
> eth1.1512
> 83.143.112.6                     (incomplete)
> eth1.1123
> 193.239.155.62                   (incomplete)
> eth1.1073
> 
> `arp -n|wc -l` returns around 350, which is the number of active ports on 
> the
> edge switches...
> this number is confirmed by snmp
> 
> I have looked through the source for arp.c but i can't see any immediate
> problems. There is no messages in dmesg, kern.log og messages (except for
> eth1.vlanid up * 600).
> 
> If anyone know what the problem can be, if this is a bug, or if PSBKC i 
> would
> much appreciate it.
> 
> regards
> ?yvind V?gen J?gtnes
> +47 96 22 03 08
> lorrides@gmail.com
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/