Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:11:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:11:10 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:43023 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:10:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:10:09 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Nicolas Aspert Cc: Didier.Moens@dmb001.rug.ac.be, abraham@2d3d.co.za, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rml@tech9.net Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: OOPS in agpgart (2.4.13, 2.4.15pre7)] Message-Id: <20011127131009.08b75571.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <3C037C73.3090003@epfl.ch> In-Reply-To: <3C022BB4.7080707@epfl.ch> <1006808870.817.0.camel@phantasy> <3C02BF41.1010303@xs4all.be> <20011127101148.C5778@crystal.2d3d.co.za> <3C034CAE.2090103@dmb.rug.ac.be> <3C036F83.2000903@dmb.rug.ac.be> <3C037C73.3090003@epfl.ch> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:43:47 +0100 Nicolas Aspert wrote: > > If there are no further complaints we should submit the patch. What do you > > think Nicolas? > > > > Well, I prefer my version on the patch (of course :-), Guess what: I expected that :-) >and I find it > cleaner. Let me explain why : by just adding the 'break', you will fall > back to the generic initialization routines, which work in most of the > cases. However, if you look deeper the code & the specs, they are not > really that good. I re-read the code according to your notes. Since I do not have the docs at hand I am going to trust your word and indeed believe your patch is cleaner. Only a personal add-on: make it a bit less verbosely talking to the user ;-) I think we do not need to tell him three times he has i830. One line should be sufficient. But obviously thats nothing of real importance. > However, before submitting the patch, I would like to hear from Didier > about the X server stuff. > Does it still hard-locks when you start it ? If testgart works (which > seems to be the case... btw, yes the 8MB alloced by the program are > normal) and X locks, this would look more like a DRI/X problem (I saw > some problems w. Radeon cards on the dri-devel list, which do not seem > to be fully solved yet) This really looks like an X issue to me and not related to agp. Thanks for your support, Nicolas. Regards, Stephan PS: you propose the patch to l & m :-) we killed yet another oops. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/