Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 02:55:06 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru>
To: ian <spyro@f2s.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-discuss@handhelds.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-discuss] [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class
	(was: battery class)
Message-ID: <20070503225506.GA20742@zarina>
Reply-To: cbou@mail.ru
References: <20070503213139.GC20067@zarina> <1178230466.20102.27.camel@wirenth>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1178230466.20102.27.camel@wirenth>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1075
Lines: 32

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:14:26PM +0100, ian wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 01:31 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >     # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/ac/type
> >         AC
> > 
> >         # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/usb/type
> >         USB 
> 
> isnt that a bit redundant?

Let me note that "usb"/"ac" is just names pda-power driver
gives for these supplies. So, it's not power supply class issue,
but pda-power.

As for pda-power.. Yes, it can name them "supply0" and "supply1"...
Or maybe "pda-supplyX", but I don't see any need to maim name just
because it is very similar to its type. ;-) Anyhow I don't care
much, i.e. if you or anyone else will insist, I'll change
pda-power's supply names with no problems.

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/