Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Message-ID: <acdf5af3-f256-8d53-ec44-fcef4022ec62@digikod.net>
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 19:05:49 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: 
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc:     Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        llvm@lists.linux.dev,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220412153906.428179-1-mic@digikod.net>
 <CANiq72=ogSxwz8iJLZaYD4nSkE71sBhT4dZyDv1HYyo5R43=pw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= <mic@digikod.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] clang-format: Update and extend the for_each list with
 tools/
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72=ogSxwz8iJLZaYD4nSkE71sBhT4dZyDv1HYyo5R43=pw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

I'm wondering about the ASSERT_* and EXPECT_* macros from 
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h
Do you think we should treat them as "for macros" as well? They can 
either be used with or without a following code block.


On 12/04/2022 17:58, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Mickaël,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 5:39 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote:
>>
>> Add tools/ to the shell fragment generating the for_each list and update
>> it.  This is useful to format files in the tools directory (e.g.
>> selftests) with the same coding style as the kernel.
> 
> Sounds good to me. There have been discussions about doing it for the
> entire tree too, so we can start with this.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel