Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d0e:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d14csp57811lfv; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:09:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJXBowa4gVwXfACuoJJDrlx1bX6P82qt4kmF7MTracXM/2kbG/K1IDI+O3BUs7cg1EpVPT X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1747:b0:505:d75c:e0b2 with SMTP id j7-20020a056a00174700b00505d75ce0b2mr9126714pfc.0.1649808569963; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:09:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1649808569; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b6y6Ut244OOSg6uJnZUTBVqeGM0FdLBrrya/6KMgZvc3oqgunbJ101FZVlOCLXMSfI FRYlsdizHSupnTtB0OBjQY219XIYRZ8iv9DA34KbC30G/f1JOi0TKV619hbXD4pltkPA tQ4Cbp8lu/GWGLIjcJwDmckna4bRkkrndvKteOyPs7UkJz8Vko7JQv2pdSeflGzzQD70 g4Zoc8MUfWmze7wxxts9ruEPxrjDVHyhF1iA5gw6rlakA7PmLL716jkJxsFykSxk814p o36IKV8xQRvNh2vGY5QntZ7Jxx23Go8wU1MQ8e5NTP0HKtsdxbCZnnv3GnGT88u2VHX+ lOlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=GGtnW7nIpf1G+VSMf6VlWk+thVYLQPvBZYgl8kKpMr0=; b=bS5+XEgoS6t44IFzRH7jNJ7N+eP1Eh5IFZcBimaEplvDqwX/Hqsw6Sv+tqq+CnhdW8 Hg/+WowvgvLJxSboMS/Z84TlRHXekHHbkUq/nD+U8CFV/gRXLjUy1Z05+j47nQgTk32h G6pG7BRYqvlSvZaAap8j783VkqD4f756Zk21XkCTuPJ2Z3246P8guPMcM5kBlxKxpkLv dscPkyK+dHNV8yyO3tun8fHMX4QZAgjFLLK/IfKo3ll/d4wbTDUCRIfOkpF51cwSsw4f KRnIovoZQSe/uJtffAFMf6JQalaRNOWDZbBS2c0pzb0csxstLuhDHcxmiJawre1E8jaJ pTaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="OOvf/m88"; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net. [23.128.96.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c4-20020a170902c1c400b00156f35a97dfsi12990300plc.430.2022.04.12.17.09.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:09:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b="OOvf/m88"; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDB91605F7; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1379521AbiDLIUg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 04:20:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43108 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1354168AbiDLH0G (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 03:26:06 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B050F45040; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E131B81B54; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A627C36AEA; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:06:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1649747160; bh=FN38w32qtUhnF2Zn1lD4Y4Ebgl+F/Fwi4fAlFKGu6+k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OOvf/m88OnymkuFe/ClB6wGkrZtB90K6e4FOEyOfQrdSOXikMs3wBbjVgvhfOX4E+ grgw2BTCyVzB1tJrwBTrSzxgQ4sUa4HQMHyMxxjcRVs+oOvM/0cDJPHzjeptucvf9y tG9VQI3afe2V2O6NNyyXyIpqbA7IkAbV9DXNXEoY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Leoshkevich , Jakub Sitnicki , Alexei Starovoitov , Martin KaFai Lau Subject: [PATCH 5.16 265/285] selftests/bpf: Fix u8 narrow load checks for bpf_sk_lookup remote_port Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 08:32:02 +0200 Message-Id: <20220412062951.307801901@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220412062943.670770901@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220412062943.670770901@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jakub Sitnicki commit 3c69611b8926f8e74fcf76bd97ae0e5dafbeb26a upstream. In commit 9a69e2b385f4 ("bpf: Make remote_port field in struct bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide") ->remote_port field changed from __u32 to __be16. However, narrow load tests which exercise 1-byte sized loads from offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_port) were not adopted to reflect the change. As a result, on little-endian we continue testing loads from addresses: - (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port + 3 - (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port + 4 which map to the zero padding following the remote_port field, and don't break the tests because there is no observable change. While on big-endian, we observe breakage because tests expect to see zeros for values loaded from: - (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port - 1 - (__u8 *)&ctx->remote_port - 2 Above addresses map to ->remote_ip6 field, which precedes ->remote_port, and are populated during the bpf_sk_lookup IPv6 tests. Unsurprisingly, on s390x we observe: #136/38 sk_lookup/narrow access to ctx v4:OK #136/39 sk_lookup/narrow access to ctx v6:FAIL Fix it by removing the checks for 1-byte loads from offsets outside of the ->remote_port field. Fixes: 9a69e2b385f4 ("bpf: Make remote_port field in struct bpf_sk_lookup 16-bit wide") Suggested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220319183356.233666-3-jakub@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup.c @@ -404,8 +404,7 @@ int ctx_narrow_access(struct bpf_sk_look /* Narrow loads from remote_port field. Expect SRC_PORT. */ if (LSB(ctx->remote_port, 0) != ((SRC_PORT >> 0) & 0xff) || - LSB(ctx->remote_port, 1) != ((SRC_PORT >> 8) & 0xff) || - LSB(ctx->remote_port, 2) != 0 || LSB(ctx->remote_port, 3) != 0) + LSB(ctx->remote_port, 1) != ((SRC_PORT >> 8) & 0xff)) return SK_DROP; if (LSW(ctx->remote_port, 0) != SRC_PORT) return SK_DROP;