Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:47:20 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update IOMAP FILESYSTEM LIBRARY and XFS
 FILESYSTEM
Message-ID: <20220412224720.GJ16799@magnolia>
References: <1649733686-6128-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
 <20220412033917.GB16799@magnolia>
 <20220412035042.GC16799@magnolia>
 <0d629b54-a29c-aeed-1330-840b1b98a8a3@loongson.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <0d629b54-a29c-aeed-1330-840b1b98a8a3@loongson.cn>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:55:39PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/12/2022 11:50 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:39:17PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 11:21:26AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > > > Remove the following section entries of IOMAP FILESYSTEM LIBRARY:
> > > > 
> > > > M:	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> > > > M:	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > 
> > > > Remove the following section entry of XFS FILESYSTEM:
> > > > 
> > > > M:	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
> > > 
> > > WTF?
> > > 
> > >  ▄▄   ▄   ▄▄   ▄    ▄
> > >  █▀▄  █   ██   █  ▄▀
> > >  █ █▄ █  █  █  █▄█
> > >  █  █ █  █▄▄█  █  █▄
> > >  █   ██ █    █ █   ▀▄
> > 
> > *OH*, I see, you're getting rid of the M(ail): entry, probably because
> > it's redundant with L(ist): or something??  Still... why does it matter?
> 
> Yes, the section entries are redundant. Sorry for the unclear description.
> 
> The intention of this patch is to clean up the redundant section entries.
> 
> > 
> > Seriously, changelogs need to say /why/ they're changing something, not
> > simply restate what's already in the diff.
> 
> OK, thank you. Should I send a v2 patch to update the commit message
> or just ignore this patch?

Yes, please send a v2 patch with an improved commit message.  NAK
withdrawn.

--D

> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
>