Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:50:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:50:21 -0500 Received: from [195.66.192.167] ([195.66.192.167]:11537 "EHLO Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:50:10 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: vda To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [BUG] 2.4.16pre1: minix initrd does not work, ext2 does Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:49:19 -0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01112715491900.00872@manta> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I have 2 slackware initrds, one with minix fs on it, other with ext2. I compiled 2.4.13 and it panics (can't mount root fs) (don't remember with both initrds or only with minix one...). I copied .config to 2.4.10, did make oldconfig and all that other reqd makes, and it boots both initrds. Finally I tried it with 2.4.16pre1 (came .config again) and it cannot mount minix initrd. ("FAT: bogus sector size 0","VFS: unable to mount root fs") I further tested and that initrd CAN be mounted by 2.4.16pre1 over loopback device with # mount -o loop /tmp/initrd.minix /mnt/mnt and # mount -t fat,minix -o loop /tmp/initrd.minix /mnt/mnt (so we can't blame FAT for first saying "Yes it's fat, don't probe for others" and then "it is corrupted, can't use") Seems there is some problem with fs detection order during root fs mount. (minix isn't tried at all?) However, I failed to grok what affect order of fs type guessing at boot... can somebody point me where to look? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/