Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 13:37:48 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To:     Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>
Cc:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
        Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>,
        Saranya Gopal <saranya.gopal@intel.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] usb: typec: tipd: Add support for polling interrupts
 status when interrupt line is not connected
Message-ID: <Ylan/MzWWTeE8hDh@kuha.fi.intel.com>
References: <20220412145059.4717-1-a-govindraju@ti.com>
 <YlaZIual4Fa/a81I@kuha.fi.intel.com>
 <5672af5d-d4a9-08ab-0594-7da57cd0972b@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5672af5d-d4a9-08ab-0594-7da57cd0972b@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:32:50PM +0530, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> Hi Heikki,
> 
> On 13/04/22 15:04, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi Aswath,
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 08:20:58PM +0530, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> >> In some cases the interrupt line from the pd controller may not be
> >> connected. In these cases, poll the status of various events.
> > 
> > Well, if the alert/interrupt line is not connected anywhere, then
> > polling is the only way to go. I'm fine with that, but the driver
> > really should be told that there is no interrupt. Using polling
> > whenever request_threaded_irq() returns -EINVAL is wrong. We really
> > should not even attempt to request the interrupt if there is no
> > interrupt for the device.
> > 
> > Isn't there any way you can get that information from DT? Or how is
> > the device enumerated in your case?
> > 
> 
> Would checking if (client->irq) field is populated, to decide between
> polling and interrupts be a good approach?
> 
> I am sorry but I did not understand what you meant by device getting
> enumerated. The device is on an I2C bus and gets enumerated based on the
> I2C address provided. The device does not have I2C_IRQ line connected,
> in my case.

"I2C devices are not enumerated at hardware level":
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/i2c/instantiating-devices.html

So your PD controller I2C slave device has to be either described in
Devicetree or ACPI tables, or there is a board file or platform driver
that actually populates the device for it.

Can you tell a little bit about the platform you are running? Is it
ARM, x86, or what, and is it ACPI or DT platform?

thanks,

-- 
heikki