Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164982968798.684294.15817853329823976469.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <164982970436.684294.12004091884213856239.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20220413093949.GW2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <20220413093949.GW2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:05:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g-88D=ysgY5aXS9-jDM+KzPqpUoKi8VxBQeK4WKtcRHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] cxl/core: Refactor a cxl_lock_class() out of cxl_nested_lock()
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:40 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>
> *Completely* untested (I wouldn't know where to begin and probably odn't
> have the hardware anyway), and known incomplete.
>
> What's wrong with something like this then?
>

I'll give it a shot, I think it solves all the cringeworthy aspects of
what I proposed.