Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <e6424c41-fadd-d326-49af-28db51606c2d@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:39:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.7.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] Refactor Ralink Pinctrl and Add Documentation
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Cc:     Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20220413060729.27639-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
 <CAMhs-H_oRzpeqJY8Oe+7Su5v-4B1WPwzOfhrvBC08FVi-O6fVA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMhs-H_oRzpeqJY8Oe+7Su5v-4B1WPwzOfhrvBC08FVi-O6fVA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 13/04/2022 08:36, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> I think you cannot change compatible strings because you have to be
> compatible with previous stuff. That is the reason why when I
> refactored all of this stuff from 'arch/mips/ralink' into
> 'drivers/pinctrl' I maintained the same for all of them and only
> created one binding for all. I know that these SoCs are mostly used in
> openWRT and the way of doing things there is that when a new version
> is released a new dtb is also compiled so I understand the motivation
> of the change itself. In any case, Rob has the last word here, not me
> :).

Breaking other users is usually not accepted, so some good reason would
be needed here...


Best regards,
Krzysztof