Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 13 Apr 2022 05:59:15 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To:     Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@intel.com>
Cc:     Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Rayagond Kokatanur <rayagond@vayavyalabs.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@intel.com>,
        Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@intel.com>,
        Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: stmmac: add fsleep() in HW Rx timestamp
 checking loop
Message-ID: <20220413125915.GA667752@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
References: <20220413040115.2351987-1-tee.min.tan@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220413040115.2351987-1-tee.min.tan@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 12:01:15PM +0800, Tan Tee Min wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> index d3b4765c1a5b..289bf26a6105 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_descs.c
> @@ -279,10 +279,11 @@ static int dwmac4_wrback_get_rx_timestamp_status(void *desc, void *next_desc,
>  			/* Check if timestamp is OK from context descriptor */
>  			do {
>  				ret = dwmac4_rx_check_timestamp(next_desc);
> -				if (ret < 0)
> +				if (ret <= 0)
>  					goto exit;
>  				i++;
>  
> +				fsleep(1);

This is nutty.  Why isn't this code using proper deferral mechanisms
like work or kthread?

>  			} while ((ret == 1) && (i < 10));
>  
>  			if (i == 10)
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Thanks,
Richard